<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fresh From Gmail/Google Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveschumaker.net/fresh-from-gmailgoogle-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveschumaker.net/fresh-from-gmailgoogle-talk/</link>
	<description>life, technology, outdoors, photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver Fox</title>
		<link>http://daveschumaker.net/fresh-from-gmailgoogle-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendfeed.com/e/ae3b7d67-6aab-e402-3e7b-3d1f21503e77#comment-854</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know - does Creative Commons actually define commercial? Apparently, they may still be studying what it means - http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/03/what-is-noncommercia.html

And also this: http://joi.ito.com/weblog/2008/09/19/creative-common-25.html

And from here: http://elamb.org/not-for-commercial-use-what-does-that-mean/
&quot;”Commercial Use” can only be determined by the owner of the product/content/service.  While some commercial use is cut and dry (i.e. selling t-shirts, webhosting services, etc) some creators of content might consider Google Adsense or YPN commercial.  It is up to the owners discretions and they are well within their rights to protect the product/service that they have devoted time/money/attention/energy to create.&quot;


Have you talked to thestandard ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8211; does Creative Commons actually define commercial? Apparently, they may still be studying what it means &#8211; <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/03/what-is-noncommercia.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/03/what-is-noncommercia.html</a></p>
<p>And also this: <a href="http://joi.ito.com/weblog/2008/09/19/creative-common-25.html" rel="nofollow">http://joi.ito.com/weblog/2008/09/19/creative-common-25.html</a></p>
<p>And from here: <a href="http://elamb.org/not-for-commercial-use-what-does-that-mean/" rel="nofollow">http://elamb.org/not-for-commercial-use-what-does-that-mean/</a><br />
&#8220;”Commercial Use” can only be determined by the owner of the product/content/service.  While some commercial use is cut and dry (i.e. selling t-shirts, webhosting services, etc) some creators of content might consider Google Adsense or YPN commercial.  It is up to the owners discretions and they are well within their rights to protect the product/service that they have devoted time/money/attention/energy to create.&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you talked to thestandard ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

